Go Back
Human Rights Watch warns rule of law disappearing in Ethiopia with opposition figures detained without charge
Ethiopian authorities have been
detaining dozens of opposition members and journalists for prolonged periods
and often without charge since late June 2020, raising serious rights concerns,
Human Rights Watch said on Saturday.
A month after one of the most
violent spates of unrest in the country’s recent history, police and
prosecutors need to publicly account for all detainees’ whereabouts, comply
promptly and fully with court bail orders, and ensure easy and regular access
to lawyers and relatives for those not released, the rights group said.
“The actions of Ethiopia’s
investigative authorities raise concerns that they have not moved on from past
practices of arresting first, and investigating later,” said Laetitia Bader,
Horn of Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “The authorities should promptly
bring credible charges based on clear facts and evidence against the detainees
or ensure their release.”
“Communities reeling from the
recent violence deserve meaningful justice,” Bader said. “Entrusted with this
responsibility, the government needs to show that it is both doing the hard
work of bringing those responsible to account and that it can adhere to the
rule of law by conducting credible and thorough investigations while still
upholding the rights of those accused of serious offenses.”
The arrests follow the June 29
killing of a popular Oromo artist and activist, Hachalu Hundessa, in Addis
Ababa, the capital. Hachalu’s death triggered unrest and violence in several
towns, particularly in the Oromia region, and left at least 178 people dead
from both civilians and law enforcement. Some were mourners and protesters,
killed by security forces when they opened lethal fire. Attacks on mainly
ethnic and religious minority communities in Oromia also resulted in killings,
massive property destruction, and displacement.
On June 30, security forces in
Addis Ababa arrested Oromo Federalist Congress leaders Jawar Mohammed and
Bekele Gerba and Balderas Party figures Eskinder Nega and Sintayehu Chekol for
their alleged involvement in the violence. The police have since arrested over
9,000 people, including government officials, many outside of Addis Ababa in
the surrounding Oromia region, where independent monitoring of hearings and
investigations is more limited.
The authorities detained
government critics across the political spectrum, including Lammi Begna of the
Oromo Liberation Front, whose whereabouts remained unknown for several weeks;
Lidetu Ayalew, founding member of the Ethiopian Democratic Party; and officials
from the former ruling Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front, such as Tewelde
Gebre Tsadikan and Berihu Tsigie.
The police also arrested journalists
representing various media outlets, including a Kenyan journalist, Yassin Juma;
Guyo Wario and Melesse Direbssa from the Oromia Media Network; and, most
recently, on August 6, Belay Manaye and Mulugeta Anberbir from the Amharic
language outlet Asrat Media.
The latest bout of violence
reflects deeper socio-political tensions, which continued to build after the
government’s decision to delay anticipated national elections due to Covid-19.
The authorities have now accused many opposition politicians of involvement in
the unrest and of allegedly directing or inciting violence, including ethnic
violence.
Federal and regional officials
blamed people acting on the orders of a breakaway armed group, the Oromo
Liberation Army, for Hachalu’s killing. They accused the Tigrayan People’s
Liberation Front of coordinating the killing and the violence that followed,
and a regional official accused the Balderas Party for involvement in unrest in
Addis Ababa.
In media reports, officials
accused several media outlets, including the Oromia Media Network, of
broadcasting polarizing content during the unrest. Authorities opened
investigations into and closed the Oromia Media Network’s Addis Ababa offices
in early July. They have since alleged that the network and Asrat Media
broadcasts incited communal violence.
Given the gravity of the abuses
and crimes during the week of June 29, Ethiopian authorities are responsible
for thoroughly investigating and identifying those responsible. But their
response should not undermine defendants’ presumption of innocence, run
roughshod over detainees’ rights, nor restrict legitimate critical dissent,
Human Rights Watch said.
Human Rights Watch interviews
with lawyers, relatives, and people released from detention found that
detentions and investigations have been marred by serious due process
violations.
Oromia police authorities
withheld the whereabouts of several Oromo Liberation Front members from their
lawyers and relatives for over a month and denied access to both even after
lawyers discovered where they were held, Human Rights Watch found. Refusal to
disclose the whereabouts or fate of someone in detention constitutes an
enforced disappearance – a serious violation of human rights and a crime under
international law, and prohibited in all circumstances.
As of August 14, lawyers still
could not meet with Lammi or another party official, Dawit Abdeta. Lawyers
representing Chaltu Takele, a political activist arrested in early July, said
they met with her for the first time in federal court around July 20, weeks
after her arrest.
Preventing detainees from
communicating with families or promptly consulting with a lawyer may place the
detainees at greater risk of abuse in detention and undermines their right to a
fair trial, Human Rights Watch said.
Human Rights Watch reached out to
the office of the federal attorney general for a response to allegations that
detainees had not been allowed to communicate with lawyers and family. The
office responded, acknowledging that communications between suspects detained
at temporary police detention centers, such as schools, and arrested suspects
and their family and lawyers had been limited at first. But they claimed that
detainees held at police stations did not face the same problem. This is not
consistent with the facts that Human Rights Watch has determined in many cases.
Though credible and thorough
investigations into complex abuses and events take time, Human Rights Watch
believes that in several cases, police authorities sought to stretch or ignore
legal requirements to prolong suspects’ detentions beyond what was justified by
law. For example, they repeatedly appealed or seemed to ignore bail orders,
requested more time to investigate, or transferred suspects between police
authorities, some with overlapping jurisdictions, without informing relatives
or counsel.
In response to Human Rights Watch
inquiries, the office of the federal attorney general said that criminal
investigations could move between various authorities depending on the location
or nature of the crime, but did not comment on how this may affect the time a
person spends in custody.
Chaltu’s lawyers and relatives
said that federal authorities ignored a July 28 court bail order and
transferred her to Oromia Police custody. For over a week, regional police
denied her access to lawyers and family, including her baby. Chaltu was
eventually taken before Sululta District Court in Oromia, where regional
investigators accused her of the same offenses cited by federal authorities.
Chaltu was finally released on August 11.
Under Ethiopian criminal law,
courts can consider appeals against bail orders, and the federal attorney
general’s office told Human Rights Watch that a detainee could stay in
detention during that appeal. However, Human Rights Watch was told of cases in
which police investigators also ignored court decisions denying appeals.
Federal and Addis Ababa police
investigators appealed a federal court bail order to release Berihu, Tewelde,
and three other detained Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front officials on July
30. Police then ignored a higher court decision rejecting the appeal, and
transferred them to a detention site at a primary school. Relatives and lawyers
said that federal authorities still have them in custody, without a court order,
and are seeking to open a new investigation based on the same accusations and
evidence.
On August 5, federal police
similarly ignored a bail order to release journalists Melesse and Yassin. On
August 11, federal police transferred Yassin to Addis Ababa police custody,
where they accused him of the same allegations.
Defense lawyers expressed concern
that courts granted repeated remand requests even though investigators lacked
new evidence. After Jawar, Bekele, Eskinder, Sintayehu, and Aster Seyoum spent
a month in detention, the attorney general opened a preliminary inquiry in
their case, a process which allows the prosecutor to proceed with a case before
a decision to proceed to a full trial is taken and continue to keep accused in
custody on remand.
Detainees have been kept at
different sites where they face increased risks of contracting Covid-19 in
detention. Relatives, lawyers, and those released said that several security
guards and detainees, including Dejene Tafa, a senior Oromo Federalist Congress
member, and Yassin reportedly tested positive for the virus that causes
Covid-19.
At a time when international and
global health experts are urging governments to reduce overcrowding in jails to
tackle Covid-19, practices that lengthen the pretrial period are particularly
problematic and ignore Ethiopia’s own commitments, Human Rights Watch said.
In the last decade, Human Rights
Watch and other domestic and international human rights organizations have
documented arbitrary arrests and politically motivated prosecutions to stifle
dissent in Ethiopia.
Ethiopia has domestic and
international legal obligations to protect basic rights, including the rights
to be free from arbitrary detention and if lawfully detained, provided with
humane treatment and conditions and guaranteed a fair trial. The authorities
should only bring charges for recognizable crimes and where there is sufficient
evidence to proceed to trial. Those detained should be informed of the specific
grounds for their arrest, be able to fairly contest their detention before an
independent and impartial judge, be permitted access to a lawyer and family
members, and have their case periodically reviewed.